Brinztech Alert: Database of Van Gool Hef- en Hijstechniek is Leaked (400GB Threatened)

Dark Web News Analysis

A threat actor known as @CCLand on a known cybercrime forum has leaked a 1GB archive of administrative folders belonging to Van Gool Hef- en Hijstechniek, a prominent Dutch company specializing in industrial lifting, hoisting, and safety equipment.

This event represents the escalation phase of a double-extortion attack.

• The “Proof of Life”: The 1GB leak is a sample released to prove the attacker’s access and pressure the victim.
• The Threat: @CCLand explicitly claims to possess over 400GB of additional sensitive data and has threatened to publish it because the company “failed to respond.” This indicates that Van Gool likely refused to engage in ransom negotiations, leading the attacker to move to “name and shame” tactics.
• The Target: Van Gool is not just a retailer; they conduct inspections, testing, and certification (EKH) of heavy lifting gear. A breach here involves critical safety data for industrial clients (construction, maritime, logistics).

Key Cybersecurity Insights

This alleged data breach presents a unique threat to the industrial safety supply chain:

• Operational & Safety Data Risk: The “administrative folders” likely contain inspection reports, safety certificates, and technical drawings for lifting equipment. In the industrial sector, the integrity of these documents is vital for regulatory compliance and physical safety.
• Failed Extortion / Negotiation: The threat actor’s statement (“if the company fails to respond”) confirms that this is a retaliatory leak. It highlights the aggressive timeline of modern ransomware groups: if you don’t pay quickly, they dump the data.
• B2B Supply Chain Exposure: With 400GB of data at risk, Van Gool’s client list is likely exposed. Attackers can use this to launch Business Email Compromise (BEC) attacks, sending fake invoices to clients for heavy equipment rentals or inspections.
• Regulatory Impact (AVG/GDPR): As a Dutch entity, this breach triggers mandatory reporting to the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP). The exposure of employee PII or client contact info in the 1GB leak could result in significant fines.

Mitigation Strategies

In response to this claim, the company and its industrial partners must take immediate action:

• Immediate Forensic Analysis (The 1GB Sample): Download and analyze the leaked 1GB archive immediately (in a sandbox). Identify exactly what was lost (Contracts? PII? Safety Certs?) to assess the immediate “blast radius.”
• Client & Stakeholder Notification: Van Gool should proactively notify its B2B clients. Transparency is critical. Clients need to know if their inspection records or billing details are about to be dumped publicly.
• Enhanced Access Control: Force a global password reset for all administrative accounts. If the breach originated from an unpatched remote access tool (common in industrial firms), shut it down immediately.
• Verify Safety Integrity: If inspection databases were touched, the company may need to re-verify the integrity of recent safety certificates to ensure no data was tampered with.

Secure Your Business with Brinztech — Global Cybersecurity Solutions Brinztech protects organizations worldwide from evolving cyber threats. Whether you’re a startup or a global enterprise, our expert solutions keep your digital assets safe and your operations running smoothly.

Questions or Feedback? For expert advice, use our ‘Ask an Analyst’ feature. Brinztech does not warrant the validity of external claims. For general inquiries or to report this post, please email us: contact@brinztech.com